- MichaelCigh, Juliyaseen, Traceypale and 62 others like this
- Cinema 4D Tutorials
- Most Liked Content
Most Liked Content
Posted by wetty on 06 October 2006 - 10:45 PM
Posted by matt bailey on 13 October 2006 - 06:04 AM
Anyone know what's going on and can anything be done about it?
Here's a pic of the problem. You can clearly see the rectangular reflection, but the alpha is a jagged rip:
- WalterBer, Garrettjam, Claudest and 9 others like this
Posted by SFX on 26 September 2006 - 04:41 PM
- ErnemtWeex, Eniliounap, LeomardKa and 6 others like this
Posted by SFX on 20 September 2005 - 08:49 AM
354 kb QT
Here is an example of using morphs with a series of meshes..err.not Al !!, timing is too slow but this was a first attempt
403 kb QT
- RolandMi, AlfredEt, CharlesBoon and 3 others like this
Posted by SFX on 20 September 2005 - 08:15 AM
- RolandMi, AlfredEt, CharlesBoon and 3 others like this
Posted by yarko75 on 10 June 2006 - 01:14 PM
More free plugins like "polygon to slpine" or "Weight it" plugins (15 in total)
All of these plugins are free except the first one (9 in total)
Again A bunch of free plugins, it doesnt show what the plugins do but look around the site to find out, Click the Porfolio:downloads tab on the top(10 in total)
2 plugins and 10 expressions (12 in total)
Just 1 plugin which is called UV2BMP (1 in total)
The only free one is "geomcheck" (1 in total)
- Thomasmi, buymakeupgi, marizLPi and 3 others like this
Posted by joelamotta on 11 October 2011 - 01:02 PM
I have been working with this tutorial.
My problem that I have is with VRAY shadows. Basically, I have set up my scene with all the exact same settings for materials, lighting and camera as specified in the above tutorial. My scene renders OK with VRAY, but it doesn't create shadows. You can see a still image of the latest of my 130 renders here. And you can see a still image of the tutorial's final render here.
During the render it seems as though shadows do appear in the first pass, but then quickly disappear soon after that. I rendered the final tutorial scene with no problems. Then I created a new scene and pasted the tutorial final scene within it and it all rendered just fine with great shadows and lighting. This was all done on the same machine with the same C4D R12 and VRAY software. So it is not a C4D or VRAY bug. I also opened the tutorial final scene deleted everything except the light and camera. Then I pasted my scene into it and again it rendered with no shadows. So I am pretty sure that the problem is somewhere within my scene. It's not VRAY and not C4D. If anyone has any idea on what it could be, please let me know. Thank you very much in advance for all of your kind help.
P.S. I tried to upload my scene and the tutorial final scene with this post but they were too big. Is there another section on Cinema 4D Tutorials where I can do that? Thanks again.
- Josepha, XjethyImisy, CharlesSTO and 2 others like this
Posted by SFX on 24 November 2006 - 05:30 AM
- GeraldKt, ModyyRern, PolyRern and 2 others like this
Posted by dataflow on 13 October 2006 - 07:53 PM
I wonder if anyone can help? I have a shape set up that uses an alpha channel to mask out half of it. However, the reflection of this object in the object behind shows up the whole shape!?
Anyone know what's going on and can anything be done about it?
Here's a pic of the problem. You can clearly see the rectangular reflection, but the alpha is a jagged rip:
is your altha channel black and white because altha is based on color, where white is transperent and black is not any color in between is going to be transperent to some degree
- Darresjomy, Nowardkiz, ArthusBob and 2 others like this
Posted by doingthedeed on 06 October 2006 - 11:14 PM
- WilliamCow, Leonardovop, NewsletterOr and 2 others like this
Posted by SFX on 06 January 2008 - 02:59 AM
- Alealokato, zoofteroppy and Tranisgalt like this
Posted by SFX on 25 February 2007 - 06:45 AM
- ElenMarselKi, Vinzentcem and Uomingib like this
Posted by SFX on 12 February 2012 - 11:04 AM
- Carolyndorb and Claudest like this
Posted by machenier on 06 December 2010 - 09:38 PM
I'm currently trying to explode an object with the Explosion FX deformer. Everything was fine until I saw that the fragments were passing through the floor. I tried to do the dynamics directly with this combination:
-Collision detection tag
-Rigid body dynamic tag
It doesn't worked and than I tried to make the dynamics in Realflow 5. The problem is when I import the .sd file, the fragment are oversized (a lot) and it's impossible to do nothing. What should I do?
- bestcigKn and DonaldJEW like this
Posted by Davied on 12 October 2010 - 01:54 AM
- Stephenhaf and Carolyndorb like this
Posted by SFX on 03 March 2007 - 11:52 AM
First Humans: Time of Origin Pinned Down
Stone Age Adults Couldn't Stomach Milk, Gene Study Shows
'First' Sicilian woman gets face
Earliest horse figures of Anatolia in EskiÂºehir
Man's best friend lends insight into human evolution
Sami jaw bones found in display case
Remains found in cave hold ancient mystery
Ancient Kingdom of Gojoseon Turned from Myth into History (Korea)
Raining on theories of Amazonian rainforest populations
Jesus Family Tomb Believed Found
Tourist invasion threatens to ruin glories of Angkor Wat
Ancient Izumo in the spotlight
France to return 'pharaoh's hair' to Egypt
Find of Roman coin shows ancient Britons in a new light http://www.telegraph.../26/ncoin26.xml
Thapar for focus on linguistic exchanges to study Aryans (India)
Sceptre from Roman emperor exhibited http://www.telegraph...27/wroman27.xml
Viking navigation hypothesis under foggy and cloudy skies requires more light
'Israelites didn't build the pyramids'
New DNA study helps explain unique diversity among Melanesians
Cemetery of headless skeletons holds key to origin of Polynesians
Rabbis seek to resume animal sacrifices
Ancient Egypt Meds: Prayer, Laxatives
Ancient city of Knidos seeks light
âRakhigarhi is the largest Harappan site ever foundâ
Unearthing a hidden past (UAE) http://www.gulfnews....e/10106600.html
Bulgaria's Perperikon - Metallurgical Centre 13 Centuries BC (Thracians)
UNESCO to examine dig near Jerusalem shrine
Copan: Colourful cultural destination
Could the âGreenland exampleâ help resolve the Parthenon Marbles dispute?
Destruction of the Achaemenid Dam of Didehgan (Iran)
Skeleton crew digs up the past
French, Iranian archaeologists excavating Achaemenid palace in Bolaghi Valley
Historic dig at planned mine site
Scholars, clergy slam Jesus documentary
Titanic Discovery or Sinking Feeling? (Alleged Jesus Tomb)
Archaeologists, scholars dispute Jesus documentary
37 archaeological sites in Delhi are gone (India)
First International Congress Of Eurasian Archeology To Be Held In Izmir
Hand Dug Corridors Discovered in Nooshabad Underground City
Jordanian-Bahraini Archeologists find More than 100 Artifacts
Artifacts could be from early galleon (North America)
Pyramids must rise above poll, says irate Egypt
Developer seeks to preserve ancient ruins (Anasazi)
UNESCO experts tour controversial Jerusalem dig
A trading hub by the Strymonas River
An unknown ancient city is brought to light
Ruin raiders target ancient relics in Shaanxi
Greek archaeologists find Hera statue
Ancient Solar Observatory Discovered
Ancient olive oil factory discovered in Milas
Italian archaeologists to join international efforts to save Sudan's ancient artifacts
Vandals Desecrate Las Vegas Cultural Site
Cloning special: Dolly: a decade on
Record power for military laser
A message for millennia -- in bacteria
Strange New Creatures Found in Antarctica
Collapse of two iceshelves exposes Antarctica's seabed beauty
The Enduring Mystery of Light
The Science of Getting It Wrong: How to Deal with False Research Findings
Scientists invent real-life 'tricorder' for chemical analysis
Studies Shed New Light on Blue Whales and Their Calls
Huge 'Ocean' Discovered Inside Earth
Mission to Study Earth's Gaping 'Open Wound'
NASA Has Plan If Astronauts "Lose It"
Looking for Life on Jupiter's Icy Moon
Camping on the Moon Will Be One Far Out Experience
Iran fires research rocket not space missile: agency
Martian moon 'could be key test'
Could we have hitched a ride on UFOs? (England)
Nasa joins with Virgin to design passenger planes for space
Virgin spaceship taking shape
New South Pole telescope to study mysterious dark energy
Milky Way Black Hole May Be a Colossal 'Particle Accelerator'
Developing Sensors to Search for Life on Mars
Jupiter's Watery Moon to Get Closeup http://dsc.discovery...=20070227103030
Space station safety report is issued
Milestone for giant physics lab
ESA director discusses space missions
Volcano Blows as Space Probe Flies By http://dsc.discovery...=20070228130000
Physicists pioneer new super-thin technology
Budget crunch delays NASA's moon ship
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says
Climate Change, Alternate Energy and Hazard Research
Professor demonstrates new hydrogen fuel system
Huge polar study about to begin
Where Bush would steer energy R&D
Scientist: Bulldoze Coal Plants
Emirates, MIT Team Up for Green Energy
Going green? Try solar handbags, wind turbines
Despite Warnings, Ocean Circulation Not Slowing Down
Scientists Offer Climate Plan to U.N.
UFO science key to halting climate change: former Canadian defense minister
Do U.S. Emissions Violate Human Rights?
Canada scientists peer into Arctic abyss, to see future
UN chief to discuss climate change at G8 summit in June
Developing Artificial Retina: Electric Link Between Neurons, Light-Sensitive Nanoparticle Films Created
Researchers confirm association between gene and intelligence
New Study: The Brain is Chaotic
Stone Age solutions to modern-day depression
Deconstructing Brain Wiring, One Neuron at a Time
Is Bigfoot Living In The Forest Above Marysville? (United States)
Book excerpts can be searched online
The Vatican turns away followers of the 'new Padre Pio' http://www.telegraph...26/witaly26.xml
Alexandria since the Arab conquest
The Pyramid mystery
The Lost tomb of Jesus: Discovery Channel
The Antikythera Mechanism
- jonijx60 and stephanietb2 like this
Posted by SFX on 02 December 2006 - 03:14 PM
On June 10, 2009 a Space.com article titled "Military Hush-Up" reported: "Scientists have benefited from data gleaned by U.S. satellites of natural fireball events [meteors] in Earth's atmosphere - but no longer. A recent U.S. military policy decision now explicitly states that observations by government spacecraft of incoming bodies and fireballs are classified secret and are not to be released. Scientists say not only will research into the threat from space be hampered, but public understanding will be diminished Where the space-based surveillance truly shines is over remote stretches of ocean But all that ended within the last few months, leaving scientists blind-sided and miffed by the shift in policy. scientists want to know about these events so they can better predict the risk here on Earth. 'Fireball data together with astronomical observations of larger near-Earth asteroids define the nature of the impact hazard and allow rational planning to deal with this issue,' said David Morrison a Near Earth Object (NEO) scientist at NASA's Ames Research Center, 'so it's ironic that the availability of these fireball data should be curtailed just at the time the NEO program is moving toward surveying the smaller impactors that are most likely to be picked up in the monitoring program. These data have been available to the scientific community. It's unfortunate this information is now shut off just when it's becoming more valuable to the community interested in characterizing near Earth asteroids and protecting our planet from asteroid impacts.'" - Space.com, June 2009
EDIT Aug 2009
NASA cannot keep up with killer asteroids
Congress assigned mission four years ago, but never gave NASA money
WASHINGTON - NASA is charged with spotting most of the asteroids that pose a threat to Earth but does not have the money to complete the job, a U.S. government report says. See last post for details
How many comets do you think there are in and around our solar system ?
A million ?
well i have been doing some more research for my mars project ( yes i know i have been "researching" this for years !! it's just that it would be such an epic project and to do it justice the renders would have to be top notch..i am a bit doubtful if i am really capable of doing it justice..so i research !!)
Firstly there is of course the confusion as to what is the difference between an asteroid and a comet, the standard differences are these :
A comet gives off gas ( this gives the tail) though many comets can become inert and many asteroids have been known to "wake up" and out-gas. So it may well be that many asteroids are "dead" or dormant comets
Comets tend to have a very eccentric orbit coming close to the sun and then moving very far away from it, however many show more regular orbits.
In general we can say that a Comet is a large rocky/icy body that tends to vent gasses when near the sun, it can become inert and resemble an asteroid, which is a non venting rock or iron bollide. A meteor is the debris from a comet or asteroid that has fragmented and a meteorite is a meteor that has made it through the earhs atmosphere
That said if we take the classical view of what a comet is then how many are there ? Well we can only approximate since 1. we don't have the time or equipment to study them all and 2. Many are just too far away
The biggest concentration of comets is believed to be in the Oort cloud, a theoretical shell of comets some 50,000 AU ( AU = distance from the earth to the sun) from the sun. The Oort cloud may contain a TRILLION COMETS..depending on your definition of a trillion... that is 1x 10e12. It is estimated that many of these could be planet killers..over 300 KM in diameter
The other main collection of comets is in the Kuiper belt, a disc shaped region some 30-50 Au's from the sun, there is no real definitive calculation of how many comets are here but it is estimated that there are around 35,000 comets in the kuiper belt that are over 100 Km in diameter and maybe 100 million 20 KM objects. the comet that wiped out the dinosaurs was about 10 KM in diameter
Mars was killed by the sustained bombardment of thousands of large impactors ( asteroids or fragment of a comet that passed within it's Roche limit)
The Roche limit is an area around a planet whos size is dictated by the mass of the planet, rather like a black hole's event horizon. It acts as a sort of protection zone for the planet. Anything really massive like a comet which trangresses this zone will get pulled apart but the planets gravitational field. this fragmentation means that altough there may well be several extinction level impacts the planet as a whole should be able to survive the impacts
A classic example of the roche limit in action was the shoemaker-levy comet impacts on jupiter, during earlier passes the comet was torn apart into many smaller ( 2Km or so) fragments
Where do these comets come from ? It has been argued that they are made from matter that never made it into the main planets, others argue that the comets are the remamnets of an exploded planet or planets that collided.
A more interesting origin involves understanding how dynamic our solar system actual is. You see the sun orbits our galactic center ( and the galaxy orbits around within a cluster of galaxies)
Now differnet stars move at different speeds around the center of the galaxy, and stars pass through the spiral arms as they rotate ( the spiral arms are themselves dynamic) It takes about 250 million years for the sun to complete one orbit of the galactic center
At the same time the sun moves up and below the galactic plane in a cyclical fashion taking 120 million years to comple a single cycle
No one really knows what spiral arms are made of, it is thought that they are very dynamic and that the galactic core is constantly generating new ones and it is now thought that comets coalesce in the spiral arms, it takes about 50-100 million years for the sun to pass through a spiral arm and cou[led with the "up and down" cycles we think that the sun enters spiral arms every 30 milliom years or so
The sun also encounters Giant molecular clouds which can be inside spiral arms or outside them. these are star nurseries and also may contain many newly formed comets. In the suns lifetime it may have come close to a GMC on 50 occasions and possibly emtered some on 12 occasions
Whem the sun enters any of these comet rich areas it "grabs hold" of some comets which enter the oort cloud, others are knocked out of their orbits and spiral into the kuiper belt and there is a knock on effect which sends others into the inner solar system
This is a regular cycle of events with a 30 million year cycle modulated by another 250 million year cycle which can be directly linked to extinction events occuring on earth 94.5 million years ago, 65 million years ago and 36.9 million years ago. These can all be linked to massive earth impacts. We are due another extinction level event..now ..Unless of course it has occured..on mars
The K/T impactor which hit earth ( the one that "did for" the dinosaurs and around 90 % of all other living species, was as i said only 10 KM in diameter, but it impacted with a force equivalent to 1000 times all the nuclear weapons that exists on earth
But the three killer objects that hit mars were hellas ( about 100 KM diameter) Isidis ( 50Km diameter) and Argyre (36 Km Diameter). Most scientists do not connect these 3 but i am one of those who believe that these three, as well as many more smaller objects, impacted about the same time and were all part of one unimaginable catastrophe that decimated Mars in a few hours.
imagine what the 100 KM hellas impact on mars would do !! then imagine it's 50 and 36 KM companions and the countless other 1 KM impactors that hit around the same time..now perhaps you know why i am so nervous about starting the project... but wow what a movie it would make !!!
here is a topographical map of mars showing the blue hellas impact crater, the entire state of Alaska could be dropped into it
- NegsonWex and gloriaej4 like this
Posted by SFX on 26 September 2006 - 12:06 PM
I don't say that to brag, i mean to state that I believe i have a good knowledge of comparative theology and a firm knowledge of Christianity in all it's forms. Learning marks gospel was not a chore, i don't know why it occurred. At 14 i was given the bible in school and told this was to be our first O-level exam so i thought since i only had one exam that year i should go for an A. I read the gospel for the first time and it seemed like a song, it just stuck in my memory. then when it came to doing the research and explanations continual exposure for several months to it.. and well i learnt it word for word
Don't get me wrong, i am not bible bashing god squad member, quite the opposite in fact !! I never really was a Christian as such, I was bought up C of E but not really that heavily
Well as i learnt more and more about the history of Christianity, learnt more about the various branches such as the Coptic church and other "orthodox" branches, i realised that Christianity could serve as an introduction, as a "warmer upper" and that if you look closely at it all the sign posts point much much farther back. even though the catholic interpretations tried to hide and bury these sign posts they are still there
So Dan Brown's book, though maybe useful to the "unitiated" unfortunately it falls short on at least 2 points
1. It fixates on the story of Jesus and his possible marriage and bloodline from Mary Magdalene
2. It incorrectly informs the reader that point 1 was the core of the Da Vinci code
Though i agree that it is possible that Jesus and Mary were married i do not see it as the most important aspect of their relationship. As i said the story of Jesus is but the beginning you have to follow the trail much much farther back in time to understand the true message that Jesus was proclaiming
That said one also has to make a lot more effort to uncover the truth about that enigmatic and elusive figures of John the Baptist and the Magdalene, it is in the baptist and the Magdalene that the true mystery is to be found, not in Jesus
Now we come to point 2. the true DA Vinci code.Unfortunately for Mr brown, the supposed marriage of Jesus to Mary is not the core of the code. It is fairly well argued that Da Vinci was an exponent of the johannite "heresy"
I won't go into all the details here suffice it to state that the johannite "heresey" holds that John the baptist was the more important figure, Jesus was one of his followers who took over the movement on john's death
There is a further "heresy" that claims that John "bequeathed" leadership of the movement not to Jesus but to Simon Magus, and as such the catholic church spent enormous efforts in discrediting and vilifying him.
In fact the most heinous sin, that of simony, derives it's name from Simon magus
Interestingly Simon was accompanied by a supposed ex prostitute called Helen, and the similarity to the role of the Magdalene is of crucial importance if you really want to understand what Jesus' religion was really about
So Da Vinci was a johannite and so in fact were many of his contemporaries and followers. To understand the johannite heresy is a difficult and laborious quest since the church has done it's best to remove all traces of the true role that the baptist played. but it is a quest worth embarking on, you will travel back to the renaissance, back to the templars, back to the Visigoths, back to the time of Jesus and his brother James, back to the Pharaohs and back to the dawn of civilisation in Sumeria
And now the pictures !! Click on the images to enlarge
This is a good example of the johannite heresy as espoused by Leonardo Da Vinci and is in fact the true "Da Vinci code"
On the 25th April 1483, Leonardo was contracted to deliver an altarpiece which would decorate the chapel of the Immacolata at the church of San Francesco Grande in Milan.
The subject of the painting was to be an event not found in the gospels. During the flight from Israel Mary , Joseph and Jesus sheltered in a desert cave where they met the child John the baptists accompanied by the angle Uriel
The reason why this legends came about is that the church had a problem with the baptism of Jesus, why would the son of god, immaculate and pure, need to be baptised by john ? from where did john get his authority to baptise ? baptism was the washing away of sins, how could the son of god need absolution from sin ?
18 When he had come into the temple area, the chief priests and the elders of the people approached him as he was teaching and said, "By what authority are you doing these things? 19 And who gave you this authority?"
24 Jesus said to them in reply, "I shall ask you one question, 20 and if you answer it for me, then I shall tell you by what authority I do these things.
25 Where was John's baptism from? Was it of heavenly or of human origin?" They discussed this among themselves and said, "If we say 'Of heavenly origin,' he will say to us, 'Then why did you not believe him?'
26 But if we say, 'Of human origin,' we fear the crowd, for they all regard John as a prophet."
27 So they said to Jesus in reply, "We do not know." He himself said to them, "Neither shall I tell you by what authority I do these things.
So the commission of the panting was to reiterate the legend which sees Jesus conferring the power to baptise onto john at an early age. It does not explain why Jesus needs baptism but it does explain why later as adults John has the authority to baptise Jesus.
The truth of the matter is that Jesus was simply a follower of John as as such all followers had to be baptised. Of crucial note here is that at the time there was no baptismal rite in Judaic tradition. Jesus may well have been ethnically a Jew but he was by no means a practising Jew, by the mere fact that he was baptised he cannot be seen as a "Jew of his time" ( Note.. the Essenes appear to have conducted some form of "water rites" or "purification by water"
Leonardo did the painting..it did not go down very well.. a law suite resulted and dragged on for over 20 years !!
In the end two paintings emerged, one was the original " heretical" painting which is now in the Louvre and a second ( perhaps doctored) more acceptable painting now in the national gallery London
So here is the first heretical painting
At first glance they seem quite similar but a second look shows the obvious differences, further examination leads to some confusion and after a while the whole concept become obscure and fuzzy, the code is starting to speak and to many it is a very disturbing story
OK so let us examine the "heretical" louvre painting
We see Mary in the middle and the angel Uriel on the right, if you look at the later London version you can just see Uriel has wings, there is still a hint of wings or a wing to be seen in the louvre version however, at the postitioning of the wing and Uriels head make the hand, discussed later and the "hunchback" very odd and unbalanced
Now it gets confusing, the child on the right is obviously conferring power with a sign to the child on the left, so the assumption ( and this was what the church saw) was that Leonardo has Jesus with Uriel and John with Mary
Mary is making the sign of a crown over the baby Jesus
But was Leonardo really saying this ? in the second painting the church had to stress the roles by giving the child on the left the cross of john and the child on the right a halo ( along with his mother)
But why would Mary be holding John? what if Leonardo really was showing Mary holding Jesus, this is far more logical, what we now have is John on the right bestowing power onto Jesus who is clearly subservient
Of course this is only an interpretation and the child on the left could well be john, but the church new of this confusion at the start and thus in the second painting felt the need to force the issue by adding the cross to John ( John is traditionally associated with a crossed staff) and halo's..why ?
and now take a closer look at the angel Uriel.
Leonardo was an expert at panting human form he attended and performed his own dissections. he knew the human form inside out. literally.
But look at that hunch back on the angel, in the London image we see wings, in the original we see one faint wing, are we to assume that the other wing is roughly bundled up inside a red cloak ? would that be the shape ?
And look at that menacing pointing hand..It cannot belong to the angel unless Leonardo has just had an artistic relapse and his knowledge of anatomy has deserted him. the hand cannot belong to the angel, well it could but the whole position is wrong it just looks so uncomfortable..Leonardo would not have made such a glaring error of anatomical proportions unless he wanted to... the logical conclusion is that it come from another body, perhaps hidden in the cloak ?
If you look closely at Uriels head and the faintly visible wing it appears that they belong to a seperate body than that of the cloak and the pointing hand, in fact the angel's left arm also seems pushed forward in relation to the angels head and neck
It is as if we have 2 people here, the head and neck of uriel and the headless torso of ..well that's another mystery but this cloak is red in juxta to the blue of Mary. Does it signify kingship? Is this a headless king ?
And what does it mean ? There is something almost aggressive about this hand, it almost accuses
note unusual hands are often seen in Leonardo's work, there is a menacing hand in the last supper and often in his works is a pointing hand known to some as the "john gesture"
Some have argued that Mary's hand is crowning a hidden head and the hand is slicing right through the neck.. a beheading of a rightful king? the baptist was beheaded
And finally take a look at the angel, in the first version the angel looks out at us with that classic Leonardo enigmatic gaze. this is not the case in the second version. Uriels' look is so interesting, there is a sort of detached non interest in the affair.
So there you have it a very basic guide to the true Da Vinci Code
My your god be with you
- Traviskib and Davinchymi like this
Posted by SFX on 20 April 2006 - 07:23 PM
Give it a try out and let us know what you think of it. I am not 100 % sure but i think the plugin only works with C4D 9.521 though the indigo program is itself a standalone application
- RybergTS and DanielKals like this
Posted by danrealflow on 22 April 2015 - 04:03 AM
This tutorial takes you step-by-step through Josh's process in creating this awesome RealFlow fluid sim which won him the RealFlow / Cinema 4D Fluid Dimension Challenge in December 2014.
The challenge was to take a photograph, convert that photo into 3D geometry and then add a RealFlow fluid sim.
This is what he did and how he did it!
- SFX likes this